moon landing hoax
Take a look at the pictures presented here and you will see that parts of the crosshairs have disappeared from the film. This is impossible unless the film has been tampered with. The crosshairs should be completely visible in all shots and not hidden behind objects in the pictures. The only solution must be that NASA has gone to the trouble of either airbrushing out certain objects in the film, or added them over the crosshairs!
Comments
Jesus, not even a nibble on this one, either.
What the hell, Kevin L.? Are we the last two alive on this board? (more like bored.)
Or someone who thinks the moon landing is a hoax could have tampered with this image. I guess we’ll never know.
we’ll know when china sends its rocket to the moon to take pictures of the ‘moon landing’
I see one picture, and it’s kind of small, and it doesn’t really look like the crosshair is behind any objects in the scene. It looks more like the crosshair is distorted and/or oddly shaped. You have a link or something?
<
So the cross is drawn onto the backdrop curtain.
or
Someone took out a piece of the cross so it looks like the cross is drawn onto the backdrop curtain.
the crosshairs are part of the camera itself
Man, if the Chinese proved we never went to the moon, I’d absolutely shit my pants in sheer joy.
Really, to me, the only acceptable excuse for me not typing this from the moon right now is that for the last almost-forty years we’ve been lying about ever having gone up there in the first place.
I seriously believe in my heart of hearts that lying about having walked on the moon for 40 years is better than actually having been there.
So what is being suggested here is that someone was taking a picture of a set here on Earth, and that whoever made the set put a crosshair in the scene somewhere to make it look like it was being shot by an astronaut’s camera, but they messed up and put the crosshair “prop” behind certain objects?
Wouldn’t it have been easier to just use a camera that actually had a crosshair?
Also, is it a coincidence that the crosshair only disappears behind bright white objects? I don’t know much about photography, but I would assume that whites require less exposure time than blacks (racism anyone?), so is it possible that white stuff just overshadows black stuff after a certain amount of exposure time?
Is this thread serious, by the way?
I’m pretty sure it’s an ongoing joke that somehow hasn’t grabbed the attention of Hutch yet. Unless he’s ignoring it on purpose (which is understandable, Hutch, you don’t have to come out of hiding to confirm that).
Kevin said:the crosshairs are part of the camera itself
How do you know the crosshairs are part of the camera itself?
Footprints are the result of weight displacing air or moisture from between particles of dirt, dust, or sand. The astronauts left distinct footprints all over the place.
Sammy said: <
I seriously believe in my heart of hearts that lying about having walked on the moon for 40 years is better than actually having been there.
i agree.
If debris from the Apollo missions was left on the Moon, then it would be visible today through a powerful telescope, however no such debris can be seen. The Clementine probe that recently mapped the Moons surface failed to show any Apollo artifacts left by Man during the missions. Where did the Moon Buggy and base of the LM go?
Paris said:
How do you know the crosshairs are part of the camera itself?
Because they didn’t have Photoshop back then. Duh.
Jay, here’s the link
Paris said: “I’m pretty sure it’s an ongoing joke that somehow hasn’t grabbed the attention of Hutch yet. Unless he’s ignoring it on purpose (which is understandable, Hutch, you don’t have to come out of hiding to confirm that).”
this is no joke, we never walked on the moon
Mom?
“Moon Landing� proves false
Sammy: Ok, then.
Sammy gets a gun, then walks to his car and drives to Pitman, picks up Kevin Baseball, and drives to John’s work.
Kevin Baseball: This is going to be so great.
Sammy: Yeah. Fuck the moon.
Sammy and Kev walk up to John’s certainly-disheveled work space, where Kevin produces a single bullet from his pocket, and Sammy hands John the gun.
John slouches his shoulders, sheds a single tear, and takes the pistol and bullet. He loads it into the cylinder, gives it a spin, and snaps it closed. He puts the gun in his mouth and does his best Kurt Cobain impression, splattering his lies-and-deceit-filled-brains against the back wall.
Weeks later, an underpaid migrant worker is brought in to remove the stain. Scrubbing like the dickens, he pauses to wipe his brow and contemplates in silent Spanish, “They can put a man on the moon, but they can’t make a solvent strong enough to get gray matter out of a carpet.�
Hahahaha.
KEV HAHAHAHAH
I think it looks like a picture of a Lego astronaut.
This is ridiculous. You find one anomaly and somehow turn it into evidence for a huge moon hoax conspiracy that has not, as of yet, been leaked by those involved in any way.
Is it really that fucking hard to do a bit of research? C’mon. You google “moon landing hoax crosshairs” and one of the first links from CNN explains what is going on in these pictures:
Camera crosshairs appear to be behind white objects in some images because the images bled slightly during development, like overexposed film.
Image composites have been done for decades on space photos. Take a look at all the mars photos! Or is that a hoax, too?
C’mon. You do yourself and science a huge disservice by jumping to such ridiculous conclusions without a shred of knowledge on the fucking subject.
I agree with John, but I could easily be swayed by more of Kevin’s storytelling. That was hilarious.
Bill said:I agree with John, but I could easily be swayed by more of Kevin’s storytelling. That was hilarious.
I agree.
3 95 8 4
I have anterograde amnesia.
3 95 8 4? Kevin L, are you breaking theScrabbled?
i thought maybe they were the lost numbers.
Apparenetly it’s the post id of a moon landing hoax video thinger I posted:
look at john, mr smarty pants, not smart enough to understand the hoax tho.
ah, kevin l has been taken over by a sammy from the past. 39584 is his code to warn us of what happened and to try and stop it before sammy kills john conner.
why are we wasting all that money going to space anyway?
act globally, not universally.
we’re earthlings, let’s blow up earth things.
hahahaha
“two dozen members in five continents…”